BallotLedger · prototype · 2026 cycle

Who funds T. Jonathan Ossoff?

U.S. Senate · Georgia · Democratic Party
Data through 2026-06-30 (latest FEC filing) FEC ID S8GA00180

Money given directly to the campaign

Contributions received by the candidate's own campaign committee this election cycle. These are subject to federal limits and itemized in FEC filings. Senate campaigns raise money across a six-year term; this page covers only the 2025-2026 election period.

SourceAmountShare of raised
Individual contributions (itemized, over $200)$28,654,21037%
Individual contributions (unitemized, $200 or less)$39,110,51551%
PAC contributions (other political committees)$920,3161%
Party committee contributions$11,0000%
Candidate self-funding$0
Transfers from other authorized committees$7,876,61910%
Total raised this cycle$77,279,766
Total spent this cycle$39,682,882
Cash on hand (includes funds carried over from prior cycles)$42,587,451

Listed rows sum to $76,572,660; the remaining $707,106 is loans, refunds, offsets, and other receipts reported to the FEC.

Money spent independently — not the campaign's money

Independent expenditures by Super PACs and other groups or individuals to support or oppose this candidate. Legally separate from the campaign: unlimited amounts, but no coordination with the candidate is permitted. This money never enters the campaign's accounts. Spenders marked non-committee filer reported directly on FEC Form 5 rather than as registered committees.

GroupPositionAmount spent
SLF PACOpposing$313,600
AMERICA ONEOpposing$87,500
HARDWORKING AMERICANS INC.Opposing$53,672
FORWARD BLUESupporting$19,695
ACTIVATE AMERICASupporting$11,978
FIELD TEAM 6, INC.Supporting$10,008
AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEOpposing$7,500
SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUNDOpposing$7,352
RED SENATEOpposing$4,400
GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTIONSupporting$1,382
All groups supporting$43,486
All groups opposing$474,025
Show all 11 spenders (1 more)
GroupPositionAmount spent
INDIGO PACSupporting$424

Support and oppose totals are shown separately on purpose — money spent against a candidate is not the same as money spent for their opponent, and BallotLedger does not net them.

Classification, plainly: the green section is money the campaign received and controls. The amber section is money outside groups spent on their own. BallotLedger never adds the two together.

Source: Federal Election Commission · original filings · Generated 2026-08-01 15:33 UTC · ballotledger.org · Prototype — not yet reviewed for publication.