BallotLedger · prototype · 2026 cycle

Who funds Michael J Rogers?

U.S. Senate · Michigan · Republican Party
Data through 2026-07-15 (latest FEC filing) FEC ID S4MI00595

Money given directly to the campaign

Contributions received by the candidate's own campaign committee this election cycle. These are subject to federal limits and itemized in FEC filings. Senate campaigns raise money across a six-year term; this page covers only the 2025-2026 election period.

SourceAmountShare of raised
Individual contributions (itemized, over $200)$4,611,65242%
Individual contributions (unitemized, $200 or less)$2,220,16720%
PAC contributions (other political committees)$787,2277%
Party committee contributions$62,0001%
Candidate self-funding$0
Transfers from other authorized committees$3,166,69529%
Total raised this cycle$10,898,177
Total spent this cycle$6,680,643
Cash on hand (includes funds carried over from prior cycles)$4,473,237

Listed rows sum to $10,847,741; the remaining $50,436 is loans, refunds, offsets, and other receipts reported to the FEC.

Money spent independently — not the campaign's money

Independent expenditures by Super PACs and other groups or individuals to support or oppose this candidate. Legally separate from the campaign: unlimited amounts, but no coordination with the candidate is permitted. This money never enters the campaign's accounts. Spenders marked non-committee filer reported directly on FEC Form 5 rather than as registered committees.

GroupPositionAmount spent
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA…Supporting$2,405,229
EDF Action VotesOpposing$1,502,983
THE SENTINEL ACTION FUNDSupporting$1,345,802
SLF PACSupporting$747,656
GLCF, INC.Supporting$157,500
FIRST PRINCIPLES DIGITALSupporting$91,847
LCV Victory FundOpposing$4,644
THE CONSERVATIVE CAUCUS DBA AMERICANS FOR CONSTITUTION…non-committee filerSupporting$4,136
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEEOpposing$2,500
All groups supporting$4,752,171
All groups opposing$1,510,127

Support and oppose totals are shown separately on purpose — money spent against a candidate is not the same as money spent for their opponent, and BallotLedger does not net them.

Classification, plainly: the green section is money the campaign received and controls. The amber section is money outside groups spent on their own. BallotLedger never adds the two together.

Source: Federal Election Commission · original filings · Generated 2026-08-01 16:37 UTC · ballotledger.org · Prototype — not yet reviewed for publication.